PROCUDEAL / ENGINE v1.9

How a deal gets made.

Know the supplier. Choose the move. Learn from every reply.

Case story ↗ Recorded arena replay

Recorded v1.9 benchmark75.09 mean10/10 valid dealsView details

THE v1.9 BENCHMARK10 hosted practice cases

10-case mean / 10075.09

Valid deals10 / 10

Engine decisions50

LLM decisions used0

PLAY A CASE

P01 final score / 10091.39

From supplier context to an agreed dealTwo LLMs / One negotiation loopv1.9 + advisory LLMs

Decision policyEmail writerLLM Decision modelSend to supplier

01 / THE STARTING POINT

Know who we’re buying from and what this deal needs.

Supplier feedback feeds both LLMsReply interpreter → decision policyDecision reviewer → supported concerns

Supplier reply → Reply interpreter → Decision policy

Extracts supplier conditions and preferences, backed by exact quotes, to inform the decision policy.

Supplier conversation → Decision reviewer ← Prepared response

Checks the prepared response for overlooked conditions or conflicts and flags supported concerns without changing the offer.

Negotiate until the deal works

The policy chooses when to counter, accept or walk away.

✓

Both LLMs advise; code owns the terms. The recorded v1.9 replay predates these two LLM stages.

Visited Current stage Advisory stages & feedbackClick a stage to inspect its evidence ↗

READY WHEN YOU ARE

Press play to watch real offers and decisions move through our v1.9 engine.

Stage order is illustrated; emails and decisions are recorded.Measured runtime 2.8s · buyer decisions 91ms